Once upon a time, I think they still exist even though I haven’t bought any for a while, in puzzle magazines there was a little game I really enjoyed doing: joining the dots. With a pen (or a pencil if you wanted the chance to erase any minor errors), you had to join the dots drawn in a square or a rectangle, varying in size, until you “revealed” a figure drawn by that connection. That must be why I’ve always liked doing the same with the reality surrounding me. “Ah, but you’re not being scientific! You must have proof to state certain things! That is how a good journalist proceeds!”. I can almost hear the many proponents of rigorous thought at any cost (some even personal friends of mine). But often the overall picture is more important than our direct knowledge. Herodotus, the great Greek historian, used two distinct verbs to describe historical facts: εἶδον (éidon): the Greek verb for “I saw”, past tense of the verb ὁράω (I see), used to declare having seen with one’s own eyes, and λέγεται (légetai): from the verb λέγω (to say), “it is said”, for expressions used to report a tradition or a piece of news without guaranteeing its absolute veracity. Well, the content of this article is based solely on my suppositions. Nevertheless, these suppositions are based on concrete facts that actually happened, and which therefore, as such, can be verified by anyone. The only thing you will not find directly is the possible thread tying them all together into what many would describe as a “conspiracy plan”. Well yes (but this is already known or could have been gathered over these years in which I have written about a bit of everything), I can say that I fall into the category of the so-called “conspiracy theorists” or “tinfoil hatters”, as many derisively like to call people like me. But I care about this exactly as much as I should, which is to say, not at all.

Phase one: the creation of the EU and the single currency

Let’s summarise the facts: that the world has not been seeing its best days is clear from quite a few years now. Particularly for us Europeans, the matter is, or rather should be, quite evident (I use the conditional because, conversely, for a vast number of people the European Union represents the “best of all possible worlds” of Leibnizian memory). From the now-iconic (journalistically summarised) phrase by Romano Prodi “We will work one day less, earning as if we worked one day more”, whose concepts were extracted from his statements released on the 12th of February 1998, the theme of which was “the 35-hour agreement and the euro” (statements of which all trace has disappeared from the Rai archives), to the press conference held on the 7th of March 2013 by the then Governor of the ECB Mario Draghi, during which he stated in no uncertain terms that reforms in Italy were on “autopilot”* (i.e. independent of individual Governments and their will), it felt like the blink of an eye. These two references alone would suffice, not to mention the reverend Professor Mario Monti, to cast doubt upon such faith in European “Institutions”. Why did I cite these episodes? Simple, because in my opinion they were a test conducted to gauge the potential rebellion of certain peoples, led indeed by the Italiots, to the glaring abuses and iniquities imposed upon them by a political and ruling class placed ad hoc to command them. While draconian measures were being imposed in Italy to respect the famous little rule, invented in 1981 by Guy Abeille, a young French Treasury official under the presidency of François Mitterrand, and later ratified by the infamous Maastricht Treaty of 1992, of the deficit/GDP ratio remaining under 3 per cent, Germany was permitted to regularly breach the subsequent rule (from 2011) with which an attempt was made to balance the sacrifices demanded of Countries in deficit: if “poor” Countries had to cut spending, “rich” Countries (with a surplus above 6 per cent) should, in theory, be monitored so as not to harm the others with overly aggressive competitiveness. A blatant taking of the mickey, as they say. And yet the Italiots have always been dutiful, even when the so-called spending overrun was in the region of “0,…”. In practice we have been more royalist than the king, continuously making sacrifices that have impoverished families and the Country as a whole. On the contrary, the Germans continued doing more or less as they pleased, caring not a jot about export limits and constantly rapping the knuckles of those Italian slackers and spendthrifts. Therefore, the first experiment was successful: the Italiots are willing to suffer without rebelling or complaining too much. After all, we just feed them football and fake battles over the defence of the environment or the civil rights (moreover at the expense of social ones, obtained through years of hard battles by previous generations) of minorities, often to the detriment of those of the majorities, over which they can tear each other apart.

Phase two: the Scamdemic (Pandeminchia)

How could we fail to joyfully remember the beautiful moments spent over the turn of 2019/2020? I shall pass over, seeing as I have spoken amply about it in other articles, all the vexations suffered by those who, like me, refused to submit to the diktats imposed by the various world governments. Or perhaps it would be better to say by a portion of them, given that in places like Africa, for example, such impositions hardly took root. Probably this latter fact was also due to the African populations being accustomed for a very long time to being subjected to large-scale experiments for all sorts of diseases and abuses (in this regard, see the beautiful journalistic report entitled “Debito senza fondo” [Bottomless debt] produced at the time for Report (back when it was still watchable) by Paolo Barnard, one of the best journalists we have ever had in Italy, in my opinion. At least until they stopped letting him practice that profession freely). Throughout the entire period of the “terrible disease”, Countries like ours, Sweden, New Zealand or Canada were the ringleaders, in one way or another, of a series of restrictive measures of all kinds to which the population mostly submitted with reverential obedience. Other Countries, such as Germany for example, saw fewer people willing to accept wholly unjustified restrictions and abuses. Nevertheless, on this occasion too, the resistance of individual populations to orders imposed from above was gauged.

Phase three: the war in Ukraine

On the 24th of February 2022, with a speech broadcast on TV at 4 in the morning (Moscow time), Vladimir Putin announced the start of the so-called “special operation” for the “demilitarisation and denazification” of Ukraine. I won’t specify here the fact that in reality the precursors that led to this “war non-war” date back to the period of the dramatic events of Maidan Square (known as Euromaidan) and the shooting at the crowd by snipers. The climax of the massacre occurred between the 18th and 20th of February 2014. I have already spoken about this too, so I won’t linger to summarise the whole discussion regarding it. This conflict represents phase three of a single discourse: besides gauging the gullibility of all of Europe regarding the causes, the protagonists and the developments of the conflict itself, an “evil” mechanism of sanctions, retaliations and vexations was set in motion, which has led to a gap, in my opinion, unbridgeable between Russia and the Old Continent (moreover literally throwing the former into the arms of other international actors, primarily China). Furthermore, it led the entire Union to finance Ukraine itself and its weaponry seemingly without any time limit. All this to the detriment, naturally, of the goods and services of European countries. With what results? Well, we have seen it clearly: an unprecedented economic disaster for the latter and the purchase of villas, various properties and golden bogs by the Ukrainian oligarchs, with chief Sniffles leading the charge.

Phase four: the war in Iran

Besides the discussion tied to the “greater Israel” project which I have already spoken about, and therefore tied to the so-called “Epstein files” and the hypothetical blackmailing detrimental to the businessman Donald Trump (a puppet of others, but certainly not as stupid as public opinion portrays him), I would say that here there are also money issues at stake, tied to imports and betting on the prices of oil, gas and various raw materials and, last but not least, the intention to damage primarily (what a coincidence) Europe once again. In this long-announced conflict, which had its precursors during the last term of the President with the golden quiff, when with announced bombings of presumed Iranian bases housing uranium enrichment sites, he had wrapped up the matter in a short space of time. This year, however, many things are unclear, starting with the announcements of the attacks, which were preceded a few minutes earlier by bets on the course of the war and the price of oil by large financial investors, who thus became even richer thanks precisely to such announcements. One must bear in mind the fact that, contrary to what people are made to believe, only 20 – 21 per cent of global oil consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz every day, and of this oil about 80 per cent is directed towards Asian markets (China, India, Japan and South Korea). So not towards Europe. As for gas, the situation is analogous. Only 25 – 30 per cent of all Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) traded globally passes through the Strait facing Iran, and once again only 15 – 20 per cent of this quantity arrives at European terminals (Italy, Germany, France, Spain). A minority percentage compared to needs. And therefore? Therefore, as usual: the European lapdogs respond to orders immediately. Funding for Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, which means against itself seeing as Europe cannot consequently avail itself of the low-cost energy that past contracts guaranteed it, and new restrictions have been imposed, this time of an energetic nature entailing movement restrictions, with all that this entails (working from home, closure of businesses, artificial increase in fuel costs, etc.). Just to mention, jet fuel for aeroplanes does not come from that geographical area of the planet at all. Thus the closure of airports and the cancellation of flights is a deliberate act decided at a desk without any concrete reason to justify it.

Joining the dots

Right then. So what do these events have to do with each other? Apparently nothing. But if one tries to look beyond their intrinsic meaning of that “εἶδον” (I saw), then one can move to another vision of things. They are all dots forming part of a plan, established at a desk a long time ago. Each Country has played a role to test the resistance of individual peoples to these events. The Italiots are among the most obedient and least rebellious. As Ernst Jünger would say, they are not predisposed to taking the “forest passage”. With them, the “system” has an easy life. I would say that so far the tests have all been largely successful, on a planetary level. The ultimate goal? A world government, passing through a phase of spheres of influence (in each bloc opposing masonic environments coexist, fighting and backing each other to reach the ultimate goal). It is necessary to get there in stages, adjusting the aim when something doesn’t proceed exactly as foreseen.

It is the time of Europe

Marcus Porcius Cato, who went down in History as Cato the Censor, in a famous speech delivered in the Senate upon his return from a diplomatic arbitration mission between the Carthaginians and Massinissa (King of Numidia) which took place in 157 BC, uttered the famous phrase: “Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam” (“Furthermore, I consider that Carthage must be destroyed”), reported by some authors as “Carthago delenda est”. Well, what I as a conspiracy theorist—because I do not have the proof (obviously)—think, is that in this period there is a precise plan for the destruction of Europe: Europa delenda est. Obviously not with bombs, but through the economy, the destruction of social, civil and cultural spheres. Why? Because, for better or worse, the Old Continent still represents the pillar upon which Western civilisation has been based for millennia. If this puzzle piece is not systematically unhinged, it will be difficult for the globalist plan to come to fruition within a “reasonable” timeframe. In the 1995 cult film La Haine (Hate), directed by Mathieu Kassovitz, the narrator repeats at the opening and closing of the film, referring to what a man falling from a skyscraper says at each floor, the phrase: “So far, so good. But it’s not the fall that matters; it’s the landing.” European citizens are like that man, but the hard asphalt is waiting for them just seconds away.

* The context was the one in which Draghi was answering the first question of the press conference, posed by a journalist asking if the political instability in Italy (due to the elections in late February 2013) could negatively influence markets and reforms. The exact phrase was: “You also have to consider that much of the fiscal adjustment Italy went through is now will continue going on on automatic pilot…” That is: “Dovete anche considerare che gran parte dell’aggiustamento fiscale che l’Italia ha attraversato continuerà d’ora in avanti con il pilota automatico…”