Mario Draghi Archivi - Invisibilia: appunti postumi di una vita qualunque

Joining the dots: the globalist plan for the destruction of Europe

Posted on 24/04/2026 by Nemulisse

Once upon a time, I think they still exist even though I haven’t bought any for a while, in puzzle magazines there was a little game I really enjoyed doing: joining the dots. With a pen (or a pencil if you wanted the chance to erase any minor errors), you had to join the dots drawn in a square or a rectangle, varying in size, until you “revealed” a figure drawn by that connection. That must be why I’ve always liked doing the same with the reality surrounding me. “Ah, but you’re not being scientific! You must have proof to state certain things! That is how a good journalist proceeds!”. I can almost hear the many proponents of rigorous thought at any cost (some even personal friends of mine). But often the overall picture is more important than our direct knowledge. Herodotus, the great Greek historian, used two distinct verbs to describe historical facts: εἶδον (éidon): the Greek verb for “I saw”, past tense of the verb ὁράω (I see), used to declare having seen with one’s own eyes, and λέγεται (légetai): from the verb λέγω (to say), “it is said”, for expressions used to report a tradition or a piece of news without guaranteeing its absolute veracity. Well, the content of this article is based solely on my suppositions. Nevertheless, these suppositions are based on concrete facts that actually happened, and which therefore, as such, can be verified by anyone. The only thing you will not find directly is the possible thread tying them all together into what many would describe as a “conspiracy plan”. Well yes (but this is already known or could have been gathered over these years in which I have written about a bit of everything), I can say that I fall into the category of the so-called “conspiracy theorists” or “tinfoil hatters”, as many derisively like to call people like me. But I care about this exactly as much as I should, which is to say, not at all.

Phase one: the creation of the EU and the single currency

Let’s summarise the facts: that the world has not been seeing its best days is clear from quite a few years now. Particularly for us Europeans, the matter is, or rather should be, quite evident (I use the conditional because, conversely, for a vast number of people the European Union represents the “best of all possible worlds” of Leibnizian memory). From the now-iconic (journalistically summarised) phrase by Romano Prodi “We will work one day less, earning as if we worked one day more”, whose concepts were extracted from his statements released on the 12th of February 1998, the theme of which was “the 35-hour agreement and the euro” (statements of which all trace has disappeared from the Rai archives), to the press conference held on the 7th of March 2013 by the then Governor of the ECB Mario Draghi, during which he stated in no uncertain terms that reforms in Italy were on “autopilot”* (i.e. independent of individual Governments and their will), it felt like the blink of an eye. These two references alone would suffice, not to mention the reverend Professor Mario Monti, to cast doubt upon such faith in European “Institutions”. Why did I cite these episodes? Simple, because in my opinion they were a test conducted to gauge the potential rebellion of certain peoples, led indeed by the Italiots, to the glaring abuses and iniquities imposed upon them by a political and ruling class placed ad hoc to command them. While draconian measures were being imposed in Italy to respect the famous little rule, invented in 1981 by Guy Abeille, a young French Treasury official under the presidency of François Mitterrand, and later ratified by the infamous Maastricht Treaty of 1992, of the deficit/GDP ratio remaining under 3 per cent, Germany was permitted to regularly breach the subsequent rule (from 2011) with which an attempt was made to balance the sacrifices demanded of Countries in deficit: if “poor” Countries had to cut spending, “rich” Countries (with a surplus above 6 per cent) should, in theory, be monitored so as not to harm the others with overly aggressive competitiveness. A blatant taking of the mickey, as they say. And yet the Italiots have always been dutiful, even when the so-called spending overrun was in the region of “0,…”. In practice we have been more royalist than the king, continuously making sacrifices that have impoverished families and the Country as a whole. On the contrary, the Germans continued doing more or less as they pleased, caring not a jot about export limits and constantly rapping the knuckles of those Italian slackers and spendthrifts. Therefore, the first experiment was successful: the Italiots are willing to suffer without rebelling or complaining too much. After all, we just feed them football and fake battles over the defence of the environment or the civil rights (moreover at the expense of social ones, obtained through years of hard battles by previous generations) of minorities, often to the detriment of those of the majorities, over which they can tear each other apart.

Phase two: the Scamdemic (Pandeminchia)

How could we fail to joyfully remember the beautiful moments spent over the turn of 2019/2020? I shall pass over, seeing as I have spoken amply about it in other articles, all the vexations suffered by those who, like me, refused to submit to the diktats imposed by the various world governments. Or perhaps it would be better to say by a portion of them, given that in places like Africa, for example, such impositions hardly took root. Probably this latter fact was also due to the African populations being accustomed for a very long time to being subjected to large-scale experiments for all sorts of diseases and abuses (in this regard, see the beautiful journalistic report entitled “Debito senza fondo” [Bottomless debt] produced at the time for Report (back when it was still watchable) by Paolo Barnard, one of the best journalists we have ever had in Italy, in my opinion. At least until they stopped letting him practice that profession freely). Throughout the entire period of the “terrible disease”, Countries like ours, Sweden, New Zealand or Canada were the ringleaders, in one way or another, of a series of restrictive measures of all kinds to which the population mostly submitted with reverential obedience. Other Countries, such as Germany for example, saw fewer people willing to accept wholly unjustified restrictions and abuses. Nevertheless, on this occasion too, the resistance of individual populations to orders imposed from above was gauged.

Phase three: the war in Ukraine

On the 24th of February 2022, with a speech broadcast on TV at 4 in the morning (Moscow time), Vladimir Putin announced the start of the so-called “special operation” for the “demilitarisation and denazification” of Ukraine. I won’t specify here the fact that in reality the precursors that led to this “war non-war” date back to the period of the dramatic events of Maidan Square (known as Euromaidan) and the shooting at the crowd by snipers. The climax of the massacre occurred between the 18th and 20th of February 2014. I have already spoken about this too, so I won’t linger to summarise the whole discussion regarding it. This conflict represents phase three of a single discourse: besides gauging the gullibility of all of Europe regarding the causes, the protagonists and the developments of the conflict itself, an “evil” mechanism of sanctions, retaliations and vexations was set in motion, which has led to a gap, in my opinion, unbridgeable between Russia and the Old Continent (moreover literally throwing the former into the arms of other international actors, primarily China). Furthermore, it led the entire Union to finance Ukraine itself and its weaponry seemingly without any time limit. All this to the detriment, naturally, of the goods and services of European countries. With what results? Well, we have seen it clearly: an unprecedented economic disaster for the latter and the purchase of villas, various properties and golden bogs by the Ukrainian oligarchs, with chief Sniffles leading the charge.

Phase four: the war in Iran

Besides the discussion tied to the “greater Israel” project which I have already spoken about, and therefore tied to the so-called “Epstein files” and the hypothetical blackmailing detrimental to the businessman Donald Trump (a puppet of others, but certainly not as stupid as public opinion portrays him), I would say that here there are also money issues at stake, tied to imports and betting on the prices of oil, gas and various raw materials and, last but not least, the intention to damage primarily (what a coincidence) Europe once again. In this long-announced conflict, which had its precursors during the last term of the President with the golden quiff, when with announced bombings of presumed Iranian bases housing uranium enrichment sites, he had wrapped up the matter in a short space of time. This year, however, many things are unclear, starting with the announcements of the attacks, which were preceded a few minutes earlier by bets on the course of the war and the price of oil by large financial investors, who thus became even richer thanks precisely to such announcements. One must bear in mind the fact that, contrary to what people are made to believe, only 20 – 21 per cent of global oil consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz every day, and of this oil about 80 per cent is directed towards Asian markets (China, India, Japan and South Korea). So not towards Europe. As for gas, the situation is analogous. Only 25 – 30 per cent of all Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) traded globally passes through the Strait facing Iran, and once again only 15 – 20 per cent of this quantity arrives at European terminals (Italy, Germany, France, Spain). A minority percentage compared to needs. And therefore? Therefore, as usual: the European lapdogs respond to orders immediately. Funding for Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, which means against itself seeing as Europe cannot consequently avail itself of the low-cost energy that past contracts guaranteed it, and new restrictions have been imposed, this time of an energetic nature entailing movement restrictions, with all that this entails (working from home, closure of businesses, artificial increase in fuel costs, etc.). Just to mention, jet fuel for aeroplanes does not come from that geographical area of the planet at all. Thus the closure of airports and the cancellation of flights is a deliberate act decided at a desk without any concrete reason to justify it.

Joining the dots

Right then. So what do these events have to do with each other? Apparently nothing. But if one tries to look beyond their intrinsic meaning of that “εἶδον” (I saw), then one can move to another vision of things. They are all dots forming part of a plan, established at a desk a long time ago. Each Country has played a role to test the resistance of individual peoples to these events. The Italiots are among the most obedient and least rebellious. As Ernst Jünger would say, they are not predisposed to taking the “forest passage”. With them, the “system” has an easy life. I would say that so far the tests have all been largely successful, on a planetary level. The ultimate goal? A world government, passing through a phase of spheres of influence (in each bloc opposing masonic environments coexist, fighting and backing each other to reach the ultimate goal). It is necessary to get there in stages, adjusting the aim when something doesn’t proceed exactly as foreseen.

It is the time of Europe

Marcus Porcius Cato, who went down in History as Cato the Censor, in a famous speech delivered in the Senate upon his return from a diplomatic arbitration mission between the Carthaginians and Massinissa (King of Numidia) which took place in 157 BC, uttered the famous phrase: “Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam” (“Furthermore, I consider that Carthage must be destroyed”), reported by some authors as “Carthago delenda est”. Well, what I as a conspiracy theorist—because I do not have the proof (obviously)—think, is that in this period there is a precise plan for the destruction of Europe: Europa delenda est. Obviously not with bombs, but through the economy, the destruction of social, civil and cultural spheres. Why? Because, for better or worse, the Old Continent still represents the pillar upon which Western civilisation has been based for millennia. If this puzzle piece is not systematically unhinged, it will be difficult for the globalist plan to come to fruition within a “reasonable” timeframe. In the 1995 cult film La Haine (Hate), directed by Mathieu Kassovitz, the narrator repeats at the opening and closing of the film, referring to what a man falling from a skyscraper says at each floor, the phrase: “So far, so good. But it’s not the fall that matters; it’s the landing.” European citizens are like that man, but the hard asphalt is waiting for them just seconds away.

* The context was the one in which Draghi was answering the first question of the press conference, posed by a journalist asking if the political instability in Italy (due to the elections in late February 2013) could negatively influence markets and reforms. The exact phrase was: “You also have to consider that much of the fiscal adjustment Italy went through is now will continue going on on automatic pilot…” That is: “Dovete anche considerare che gran parte dell’aggiustamento fiscale che l’Italia ha attraversato continuerà d’ora in avanti con il pilota automatico…”

Everything is proceeding as foreseen

Posted on 09/10/202302/04/2026 by Nemulisse

I confess my youthful passion for sci-fi sagas. In particular, I remember a phrase uttered by the “villain” par excellence of the Star Wars saga, Emperor Sheev Palpatine (alias Darth Sidious or Lord Sidious), spoken in a scene from the sixth episode (the third film of the series, directed by Richard Marquand) Return of the Jedi, whilst conversing “amiably” with another of the story’s iconic characters, Darth Vader: “Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen”. I could utter this phrase myself based on what I had already written in several of my articles a long time ago. Or, more appropriately, it is what I imagine the true authors of the epochal change we are living through (or undergoing, I should say) are saying to each other. Indeed, because things could not be going any better for them. Between fake (or deliberately provoked) “climate changes”, “phoney” wars that serve no other purpose than to contribute to the destruction of the European economy, mass deportations of “refugees” that serve (or will serve) only to further destabilise—especially socially—European countries (Italialand foremost) already severely weakened by sanctions (real or fake), vexatious measures of various kinds imposed by the puppet bureaucratic apparatus of Brussels and Frankfurt, and the returns of fake scamdemics adapted with new disease variants, I would say that if I were in their shoes I could only congratulate myself. So far they have done an excellent job, obviously from their point of view. Not to mention what they are implementing for social control, through the digitisation of currency and the data of all the sheep (us) governed via technology, the primary tool of which, as I have written more than once, is our now inseparable smartphone.

Ah, but the BRICS…

A tragedy then? “Of course not!”, the optimists maintain. “There are the BRICS, there’s Donald Trump, there’s Putin…”. In short, there are “Saviours of the Homeland” fighting on our side. At least, this is the narrative pushed by many people belonging to the so-called “counter-information”, such as Cesare Sacchetti with his La cruna dell’ago (The Eye of the Needle). I shall suspend judgement on the author, although I have more or less formed my own opinion on him over time. Certainly, what I find scarcely credible is his narrative regarding the birth of the BRICS and the figures of characters like Trump and Putin. On the contrary, to understand the existing interconnection between the various global power groups, I find the excellent blog The Mirror Truth essential, as it reports with detailed analyses the deep ties between the high finance of the usual suspects and global economic potentates, including those of the Chinese mandarins. Figures like Donald Trump or Elon Musk are considered, as I was saying, by parts of the so-called counter-information as champions to look up to when dreaming of an “old-fashioned” world, like when it seemed to us all that things “were normal”. In reality, they, just like Putin himself (whether it’s the real one or a body double), belong, just as much as the various Bidens, Trudeaus, Sunaks, Von der Leyens & Co., to freemasonry, only in lodges opposing those of the latter. I shall leave aside the figure of Putin, because it would take too long to outline here. Trump, besides the famous story of his hotel chain saved from bankruptcy thanks to the intervention of a small bank owned by the usual Rothschilds (a story very well told by Pietro Ratto in his books I Rothschild e gli altri and Rockefeller e Warburg, le famiglie più potenti della terra), has close ties, through his son-in-law Jared Kushner, with the Hasidic Jewish community, and it is precisely through the latter and his son Donald Jr. that he is linked to the giant Blackrock, hence back to the Rothschilds. I want to dwell a little longer on Musk, seen by everyone as a somewhat crackpot and genius visionary.

“Green” mobility

Among the many activities of the volcanic character is, as everyone knows, that of entrepreneur, and especially that of electric car manufacturer with the Tesla brand. But the production of electric cars has something inherently amiss about it. Personally, I interviewed a worker at the Berlin plant of this car factory, curious about the methods, quantities and production times (in Berlin, specifically, the Model Y of the range is produced). Well, to my great amazement, I discovered that every day Musk’s plant churns out roughly 1,000/1,200 cars (one every 45 seconds, based on a 24/7 production cycle divided into three 8-hour shifts). Obviously, the number of vehicles produced, which they would like to increase to one every 40 seconds, depends on hiccups that can occur on the assembly line. Translated, this means that at the current production rate the plant turns out about 36 thousand cars a month, i.e. 432 thousand a year. If the production time were to drop to one every 40 seconds (in Asia they already produce at a rate of one every 35 seconds), it would mean an average production of 720 thousand vehicles a year. And this is just for the Model Y. Now, calculating that, according to Il Sole 24 Ore, the production of BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle, therefore not hybrid) cars sold last year in Europe amounted to 1.56 million units (of which Tesla indeed dominates with its Model Y at 137 thousand vehicles sold, followed by its other Model 3 with 91,500 vehicles sold) and with a constantly growing production rate (at least according to forecasts), the question arises spontaneously, as Catalano would have said: but with all these electric cars produced, what do they plan to do with them? This question also stems from the consideration that the third most sold model turned out to be the Volkswagen ID.4, but with only 67,500 registrations, and all other models declining. Not to mention the fact that the average price of a Tesla Y ranges from roughly 50 to 60 thousand euros. How many Europeans will be able to afford the luxury of abandoning their “old” combustion cars, perhaps bought only a couple of years ago, in favour of an electric vehicle? All this without mentioning the “presumed” convenience of electric power, both in terms of production costs and energy efficiency, and in terms of the actual possibilities of producing “clean energy”. In this regard, the considerations made by the engineer Fabio Castellucci are very interesting (you can find them in several online interviews: for example here or here). In my opinion, they will therefore find some form of “incentive” to forcefully push the transition to electric mobility, perhaps making it practically impossible to economically sustain the costs of a “traditional” car, whilst simultaneously offering the wonderful possibility of using a BEV (and therefore being able to move around with “one’s own” vehicle) in exchange for yet another dose of the vaccine or the definitive abdication of privacy. All this with a view to the maximum movement allowed in “15-minute cities”, thus perfect for the limited range of electric mobility. In practice, you will have to stay in city enclosures, where you can be easily controlled. All this always with the excuse of “safeguarding the environment”. In practice, we will have a mass of people convinced that the world is dying due to human wickedness. To this end, they have created a mass of younger generations of “climate morons” who, between chucking a bucket of paint at a work of art or a monument and gluing their limbs to the city asphalt, think they are saving the planet. All whilst scolding you, you filthy polluting Panda drivers! Leaving aside the fact that at the same time the mighty of the earth gather periodically in fabulous places around the planet to tell us all how we must behave in order not to pollute, eating crickets and synthetic meat, whilst they travel exclusively by private jets, eating extremely expensive delicacies, produced and cooked the “old-fashioned way”.

The wonderful world of Italialand

So, whilst the destinies of the world pass through the “fake” Ukrainian war, the umpteenth regurgitation of the scamdemic, climate “changes”, the forced and forceful intake of Africans into the Old Continent and the increasingly manifest economic ruin of the latter, in the wonderful world of Italialand, among the many pieces of bullshit (for linguistic purists, see the link provided) with which the Italiots are fed, two in particular occupied all the mass media and the “polite” (and otherwise) salons of the Peninsula for whole weeks: the generalissimo Roberto Vannacci, dubbed (by me) “Flatfoot in Africa”, and the Esselunga peach of desire. I wanted to nickname the former thus because, in an image published in the Italiot weekly Chi, he reminded me very much of a character played by Bud Spencer (Carlo Pedersoli) in a tetralogy released in the Seventies directed by Steno. The generalissimo, a character created ad hoc to shift the attention of the average Italiot, is blatantly a gatekeeper, to use “modern” parlance, that is, a system infiltrator, as one would have said once upon a time. Perhaps he will even found his own political movement, to further divide (as if there were any need) our homegrown public opinion a bit more. On the other hand, the strongman, leaning towards being a bit of a tosser… whoops, I meant to write a braggart, has always been popular in our parts. But as we know, Italiots are also very fickle, so they must also be given “lighter” stories and those of “good feelings” to focus their attention on. So? What is to be done? Why, it’s simple: you whip up a case to get them arguing heatedly for weeks starting from a “cynically clever” commercial, as they would say in the Capital. One of those tear-jerker commercials, like the ones that every year, punctually, just before Christmas, a very famous supermarket chain churns out in Germany. Good feelings towards the grandmother or grandfather of the moment in the latter case, good feelings towards the little girl of divorced parents in the former. On the other hand, why on earth should the fellow citizens of the lovely Esselunga family focus on an economic and social situation that is disastrous to say the least? Heaven forbid that someone (by now an endangered species) might get the urge to protest, or, I don’t know, rebel against the puppet government of the moment. Indeed, because it is not even worth seeing who the current appointee is to shuffle the papers at Palazzo Chigi anymore. In this regard, the concept was well clarified by the Saviour of the Homeland Mario Draghi, when he still held the role of head of the ECB: “Markets do not fear elections, reforms have an autopilot”. And that is the only thing that matters. Decisions are made elsewhere. The people, in practice, delude themselves into thinking they count for something by choosing puppet candidates from this or that party. Exemplary in this respect is the phrase of the other Goldman Sachs strongman, the venerable Professor Mario Monti, when in an interview in 2015 he said: “Can one hope that public opinion will become aware of the loss of leadership on the part of those governing? Is it possible for the sheep to take to guiding the shepherd in the right direction, even assuming control of the sheepdog? A bit difficult.” Therefore, sheep, graze and keep quiet!

Israel, fair land of love

As I am about to conclude this long article of mine (as usual, you will say! But then again, one cannot encapsulate so many topics and considerations in a tweet), the news arrives of the Hamas attack in multiple parts of Israel. The situation is still unfolding and, in my opinion, it is a bit too early to say what is really happening: a real attack according to some (namely Israel’s supporters), a “false flag” according to others (Palestinian supporters). It is highly likely that this could be the actual beginning of the escalation of the Third World War (already underway in several parts of the globe: Europe, Africa, Asia and now the Middle East under different guises). In any case, it is yet another symptom of the struggle taking place at the top of the masonic power groups, never before so at odds with each other to decide who will lead the imminent future world, the one of digital control towards which everyone, none of the great powers excluded, is heading at full sail.

The first victim of the war

Posted on 07/04/202202/04/2026 by Nemulisse

When events flow at a whirlwind pace, I believe it makes little sense to write about their causes and where they will lead in the future. To understand, one must wait and pull the threads of various plots unfolding simultaneously, yet (at least apparently) disconnected from one another. I fear it will not be long before the developments—tragic, in my opinion—of everything humanity has been experiencing for two years now reach their culmination point. Briefly recapping, we have suffered the fake scamdemic of Sars-Cov-2. Today we know full well where it originated (link 1, link 2, link 3) and who was, so to speak, its “mastermind”. In reality, we should say “the masterminds”, who are always the usual suspects. They are just over a hundred powerful families and autocrats in the world who, I stress, by mutual agreement, decided which changes humanity should be steered towards in a short space of time. Alongside the usual Rothschild, Rockefeller & Co. families, this group includes the nomenclature of the Chinese mandarins (with whom, as Nicoletta Forcheri rightly pointed out, the Rothschilds have been doing business for years now), the Vatican, the Mafia and Vladimir Putin’s Russia (perhaps the only one slightly more tied to the “old school” world in some respects). Moreover, they have explained everything clearly and in broad daylight during their various, by now semi-legendary, meetings of the Bilderberg group or Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum and his Agenda 2030. You will own nothing and you will be happy (and controlled from morning till night). Thus their motto can be summed up. All this via technology. The entire operation was prepared long in advance, and the methods used to introduce it were manifold. Internationally, tension was kept high with various colour revolutions and terrorist attacks in several nations, whose extremist perpetrators (usually Arabs) can only be believed by primary school children or the sheeple (that is, 90 per cent of humanity). Paving the way for a change in lifestyle, on the other hand, was left to political movements like the “5 Stars” in Italy, or the Greens in Germany, as well as the champion of the “climate change” protest Greta Thunberg and the lobotomised “climate morons” (gretini) of all ages, magically popping up like mushrooms all over the globe (the mother of idiots is always pregnant, as one would have said in past times outside the realm of political correctness). Finally came the war in Ukraine. As in all wars, the first victim to pay the price is the truth. The only sure thing is that none of the parties involved, Europe included, gives a toss about the Ukrainian population. A “strange” war, that never officially declared between Russia, the invader, and Ukraine, the attacked. The story, as we know, goes way back. At least from one side of the issue. Namely, the continuous transgression of the agreements made at the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall between the former Soviet Union and NATO regarding respect for the neutrality of former Soviet territories (Ukraine included), and the treatment reserved for the Russian-speaking populations of the Donbass, with Russia’s recognition of the independence of the two republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. In this regard, see the excellent work of Giorgio Bianchi, one of the few real journalists who, on the ground, is recounting (at the time of writing this article) how the facts are truly unfolding and how they unfolded in the past. That being said, however, the general situation remains to be analysed. As I said earlier, Russia too is part of the power group that wants to carve up the future world. However, I think that along the path supposed to lead to this goal, there are actual clashes between the actors on the field. In this case, the United States and Great Britain, using the smokescreen of NATO, and on the other side Tsar Vladimir. The first two tried to deal a significant blow to their rival, failing to calculate that the latter is actually a much tougher nut to crack than they thought. If we add to this the fact that China (Washington’s true target) has joined forces to form a common front with Russia, the picture is problematic to say the least.

Farewell Dollar, farewell

Aside from NATO’s undeniable encirclement of Russian territory and the attempt made in Ukraine, using the Old Continent at their pleasure (as usual), what is now at stake is monetary supremacy and the transition (desired by all competing actors) to digital currency. First step? Putin’s massive shoulder barge to the Dollar: demanding payment for the precious (at least for Europe, the real loser in this whole dispute) Russian gas in roubles and no longer in Euros or Dollars has marked a point of no return to the past. The cost of gold in Roubles is lower than that of the same in Dollars. The Petrodollar, which replaced the Bretton Woods agreements in 1971, has reached the end of the line. Russia and China have decided that the time has come to retire it. But beware, this is not a game of the good guy against the bad guy (in this case, the Russians against the Americans). I absolutely do not belong to those on the Web who are gloating at the mere thought that globalisation has reached the end of the line. Globalisation as we had understood it up until now, yes. But the elites have transformed it and conceived a form of digitised global control. It is no coincidence that Russia also accepts payment for its raw materials in Bitcoin. Because the Russians know very well too that digital currency (which is unfortunately the future of commercial exchanges of any kind) allows for almost total social control. Besides knowing perfectly well where an individual is and what they are doing, if they were to fail to abide by the diktats of those in command or transgress the rules imposed upon them, they could be immediately punished through the instant closure of their credit, making their life practically impossible. Exactly as is currently happening in China in several regions, whose model is the one inspiring the “liberal socialists” à la Mario Draghi*. This is why there was the “pandemic” first and now the war. Everything was already planned, just as climate changes are planned. Everything tends towards a single goal: the world will be divided into three power blocs. The Anglo-American one on one side, with Canada, Australia and various colonies; the Sino-Russian bloc on the other, with India and other countries tied to their economies; and finally Europe, or rather what will be left of it. Indeed, the weak link is precisely us, crushed by American interests on the one hand and a lack of raw materials on the other. We were, or rather we are, the tastiest morsel. We are a relatively rich continent and we have, we Italians in particular, the highest number of artworks in the world and a high rate of private wealth, both movable and real estate. I have to laugh at those on the Web who claim: “Globalisation is collapsing”, or “it’s all coming down. We’ve won”, or rather “Putin is the last champion against globalisation”. Putin is undoubtedly an excellent old-school politician, and first and foremost he looks after his own nation’s interests, but he is no saint, no more and no less than the others. He too has a very specific goal: to carve out a slice of the global pie for himself. The only difference is that he does it with a sort of ethics that his adversaries/accomplices have long ceased to apply. Or perhaps never applied. As they say, dog doesn’t eat dog. Or rather, every now and then they try to, perhaps hoping to catch their antagonist unprepared, but the ultimate goal is always well in sight for everyone. China, having now become an economic and technological giant, is the true antagonist of the United States (who had initially favoured it thinking they could relegate mass industrial production there, failing to realise instead that they had made Western companies dependent on it for strategic industrial production). The Chinese empire possesses great power in construction logistics, something that can come in handy for Russia which, conversely, except for Moscow and St Petersburg (i.e. the “European” part of its territory), has vast quantities of raw materials but lacks the infrastructure. Therefore, the Chinese and Russians have allied for a mutual exchange in this sense. Vladivostok in particular represents the spearhead of this alliance, as a port facing the Sea of Japan, hence the Pacific Ocean, bordering China and North Korea and which, via the Bering Strait, represents an alternative for transporting goods through the Northern Sea Route (which now, with the melting ice, is a more than viable alternative to the usual routes mostly controlled by the opposing economic bloc). Both China and Russia have bought large quantities of gold on markets all over the world in recent years, precisely in anticipation of “decoupling” from the petrodollar. After the United States, the largest holders of gold in the world are Germany, and indeed us, followed by the French and the Swiss. Thus, we Europeans are like a big pie to be carved up. What follows is easy to predict.

Where our political class comes from

As I was saying, in the end the one to lose out will primarily be the Old Continent itself, which has no energy resources of its own and will see its manufacturing industry and enterprise go up in smoke. The first warning signs are already clearly visible in many countries; ours, needless to say, among the first. Inflation has started galloping almost everywhere and ultimately the result will be a genuine disaster. European rulers, none excluded, belong to that ruling class that is either inept (and chosen to govern for this reason) or colluding, having grown up precisely within the institutional, educational and university, then political and social establishments of the elites who rule the world. In this regard, see Davide Rossi’s excellent book La Fabian Society e la pandemia. They are a bunch of parvenus ruling us not in our interest, but in that of the elites who trained them and put them in power. All this amidst the culpable distraction of the masses, lulled to sleep behind the latest mobile phone model, or the football team of the moment, or the advice of the influencer (artfully created, of course) touting consumer goods of all kinds, occasionally dispensing pearls of political or social wisdom to follow. Two years of the “pandemic” have clearly shown how a very few individuals, rich beyond the limits of imagination, have managed to pit the rest of humanity against each other. And all this by making them believe, through the exceedingly powerful means of totally subservient media, that one must fight not against what would once have been called the “system”, but in favour of it. Obviously in the name of the “common good” and to counter emergencies (created ad hoc by themselves). Not even Nazi propaganda managed to achieve as much. Dictators needed force to ensure the population obeyed through gritted teeth (obtorto collo). Instead, for the first time in human history, the victims voluntarily submitted to every sort of oppression by their executioners. I repeat, out of fear, exhaustion, cowardice, or simple compliance brought about by induced collective hypnosis. I would say very little hope remains regarding a recovery of position on the part of the world’s populations. Even if they are the absolute majority, the position they have reached is of such weakness as to leave no room for hoping for a general uprising. The revolts, as we have unfortunately seen several times during this period (Canada, Australia, France… Italy itself), have always been silenced by force, aided also by a quiet compliance from the “rebels” still deluded by the fact that one can expect justice from institutions, believing them to be impartial (super partes) and acting for the “good of the people”. In reality, that fine line between the legal and the illegal was crossed a long time ago by those who should have protected us against economic power. Now it is this very power that has taken the place of the legislative and judicial ones. And, unfortunately, I see no way of stopping it.

The Eurogendfor

Furthermore, what seems inevitable to me is civil war in several countries, because when push comes to shove (and in my opinion it will be much sooner than one might think), the social clash between these elites and the lower-middle class will be inevitable. As Cato the Censor used to say: “The stomach has no ears”. And many will be the stomachs that will be left empty very soon. I think attempts to placate them with some sort of universal basic income (already tried in various guises in different parts of the world, Italy included) will be to no avail, and the intervention of repressive violence will be the only way to contain the anger of the people. Do you remember the Eurogendfor? Probably not. It is that military corps established during the European Council of Nice in December 2000 and definitively made official with the Treaty of Velsen in 2007, the latter signed by France, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands and, obviously, Italy, whose headquarters are in Vicenza (where, coincidentally, one of the most important American bases in Europe is located). The treaty consists of 47 articles, among which some interesting things can be read. Its tasks are: “to conduct security and public order missions; to monitor, advise, mentor and supervise local police in their day-to-day work, including criminal investigation work; to conduct public surveillance, traffic regulation, border policing and general intelligence gathering; to perform criminal investigation work, detect offences, trace offenders and transfer them to the appropriate judicial authorities; to protect people and property and keep order in the event of public disturbances” (Art. 4). The scope of action: “EUROGENDFOR may be placed at the disposal of the European Union (EU), the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and other international organizations or ad hoc coalitions” (Art. 5). The headquarters and command cabin: “the multinational police force with military status consisting of the permanent multinational, modular and projectable Headquarters located in Vicenza (Italy). The role and structure of the permanent HQ, as well as its involvement in operations, shall be approved by the CIMIN – namely – the High Level Interdepartmental Committee. It constitutes the decision-making body governing EUROGENDFOR” (Art. 3). The EGF enjoys total immunity: inviolable premises, property and archives (Arts. 21 and 22); communications cannot be intercepted (Art. 23); damage to property or persons cannot be compensated (Art. 28); gendarmes cannot be investigated by the justice system of the host countries (Art. 29). As is clearly evident, a series of privileges inconceivable in a state governed by the rule of law. On the 14th of May 2010, the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic ratified the agreement. Present 443, voting 442, abstentions 1. 442 voted yes: everyone, none excluded. If a part of the “regular” law enforcement agencies, as I suspect, takes the side of the oppressed, who do you think the oppressors will use to contain the revolt and break the rebels? We leave the arduous verdict to posterity.

Regarding the latter, to all those who say that it is a Government of incompetents that has been leading Italy for two years now, I answer that it is not so: they know perfectly well what they are doing (they are told what to do) and they are doing it well. At least from their point of view.

The best of all possible worlds

Posted on 14/05/202102/04/2026 by Nemulisse

The “pandemic”, vaccines, masks… all the main topics one hears about from morning to night everywhere, on TV, on social media, on the streets. By now we have become accustomed to these themes and practically take them for granted. A bit like talking about the weather when you don’t really know what else to converse about. By now it is taken for granted that freedom is represented by being able to get vaccinated (or branded, like cattle, depending on one’s point of view) with the method deemed most suitable for oneself and as quickly as possible, and not by the fact that one might not want to get vaccinated. The latter, on the contrary, is viewed and singled out as the most heinous of sins in the social and even moral sphere (I dealt with this in this article). Anyone who harbours doubts about wanting to have the saving liquid inoculated into them is blacklisted and considered a pariah and a plague-spreader. This “branding” operation is put into effect starting with the various camel-mounted troops of “information”. At every hour of the day and night the usual faces of “experts”, pundits and politicians endlessly repeat the sung mass they have been told to propagate, regardless of their own competence and ability to understand what they are repeating ad nauseam. And this happens everywhere, in every Country, more in some, less in others, and with methods that change depending on the type of culture of the Country itself. Here at home, in Italialand, other accompanying diversions are added to this uninterrupted hammering, partly because they are typical of our culture, and partly because, as I have stressed at other times, we are a perfect people for conducting large-scale social experiments on. The latest in chronological order is the discussion on the so-called “Zan” law (a bill to be precise), passed in the Chamber of Deputies and now under discussion in the Senate. Of this specific legislative measure, Article 4 would need to be examined and investigated in depth, as it provides the means (were the law to pass as it is) to accuse anyone of crimes of opinion should they express thoughts not conforming to those of the “politically correct”, which might “offend” whoever on topics of a sexual and “inclusive” nature (a term so dear to a certain political side, and which deliberately means nothing concrete in itself). But I will not dwell on discussing it here now. There will be other occasions. However, there is an aspect of this whole “surreal” situation which in my opinion has not yet been highlighted well enough. It concerns the tight connection that actually exists between the “pandemic”, the restrictions implemented to “control” it, vaccines and… the “ecological transition” and so-called “digitisation”. Apparently these topics would be unrelated, but upon closer analysis the threads can be joined together. Let’s start with the last two.

Climate, ecology and bits aplenty

In the month of April, the European Union (Council and Parliament) reached a political agreement (confirmed a few days ago) that introduces into legislation the objective of climate neutrality (namely the Earth’s ability to absorb the greenhouse gas emissions produced) of the EU itself by 2050, and a collective goal of reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 per cent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. Following this decision, or rather afterwards, the German Constitutional Court issued a ruling defined by all media as “historic”: “…The provisions of the Federal Climate Change Act of 12 December 2019… are incompatible with fundamental rights insofar as they lack sufficient specifications for further emission reductions from 2031 onwards. The Climate Change Act obliges the Federal Government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55 per cent by the year 2030 compared to 1990… the complainants, some of whom are still very young, have had their fundamental rights violated by the challenged provisions”. Indeed, “the young”, because many of the complainants were precisely those youth movements that identify with Greta Thunberg’s “Fridays for Future”. What a coincidence. And the German Government, so sensitive to the demands of the young (or perhaps of its entrepreneurial class?), promptly upped the ante, increasing Germany’s emission reduction target for 2030 from 55 to 65 per cent. The federal cabinet intends to pass a corresponding amendment to the Climate Change Act in the near future. The alternative energy to coal and lignite to keep German industries running in the future will most likely be hydrogen and dual-fluid nuclear power (to be clear, the reactors fitted on submarines), but for the moment gas remains the most viable energy source for replacing coal. Hence the agreement with the “big bad” Putin for the construction of the doubling of the Baltic Sea pipeline, the so-called “Nord Stream 2”, so fiercely opposed by the other big bad Trump first, and by the good Biden now. Opposed clearly not because anyone believes the joke about the wickedness of the Russian “enemy”, but because the United States must export their shale gas to Europe. Therefore Germany runs with the hare and hunts with the hounds, so as to displease no one. A masterpiece of economic diplomacy to get what it needs: exporting galore is the goal that cannot be compromised on, therefore… Therefore German industry, the true Panzer of the “locomotive of Europe”, is getting ready, in every sense. It needs to reconvert its means of production, also through digitisation (which as we shall see is not only for this purpose), but to do so it must invest substantial capital. So what better thing than to make all the “customers” themselves pay for this “transition”, namely European citizens through the (fake) funding of the Recovery Fund (which actually, in words, should serve for the damages deriving from the “pandemic”)? But how to do it? Simple! First of all you must find an ally that has the same need for industrial reconversion (read France), then you push at a political level so that the decision to adopt them is taken by all the other Countries (there must be an absolute majority). After that, you rap the knuckles of the most rebellious to make them accept this “little suppository”, consisting mostly of loans that will have to be repaid with interest (Italy is earmarked for about 191.5 billion, of which 68.9 in grants and 122.6 in loans. In addition, another 31 billion are envisaged from the so-called Complementary Fund and 13.5 from the “React EU” programme) with (fake) threats not to grant the aid itself. This is for a portion of the funds necessary for this transition. Then there is the political aspect. You must push those parties and movements that in the common imagination are most linked to “green”, “ecology”, “safeguarding the environment”. Namely the Grünen, the German Greens. And how to garnish this choice on the international wave of the “politically correct”? Why, it’s obvious! With a female candidate for the chancellorship for the upcoming September elections: Annalena Baerbock, 40 years of pure inexperience and lack of substance. The ideal candidate to drag along that young, or youthful, electorate so beloved by the people who matter. Everything “green”, spiritual, innovative and, why not?, digital. Yes, because the future passes through bytes, or rather through the Yobibytes (2^80) of data that circulate and will increasingly circulate on the Web. A mountain of data, worth as much gold as its immense mass. And to do this, Germany wants to catch up with the times, like its American and Chinese economic competitors, through the construction of quantum super-computers (capable of performing calculations, which the fastest computers in the world would take 10 thousand years to solve, in about 3 minutes and twenty seconds). Such computing power can be applied to infinite sectors, from the strictly commercial to the military, from the financial to pure research. In particular, the medical sector will benefit from it.

Resist, or rather no! Be Resilient!

Of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (a term used so much lately, and not by chance) which is divided into 6 “missions”, i.e. compartments to put it the Italian way, the chapter reserved for Healthcare or Health (here too the change is not accidental) is the one which has been allocated the smallest slice of resources (a mere 15.6 billion from the NRRP + 1.71 from React EU + 2.89 bn from the complementary fund) out of those that will “arrive” from Europe. But how? Are we not in a global pandemic emergency? Seeing as there have been so many (justified) complaints about the lack of intensive care beds in our hospitals, how come no steps have been taken in over a year to increase them? Oh, right! We bought the desks on wheels, those were the real necessity! Furthermore, for those who don’t know, our Governments (Conte first and Draghi now) have to this day not allocated a single euro to research in our Country on Covid-19, the “greatest pandemic the history of humanity remembers”… And yet from morning to night, as we were saying, we are bombarded by constant messages reminding us how dangerous the “virus” is, how important it is that we continue to maintain “social” distancing, that we must be “responsible” so as not to ruin those two crumbs of freedom we have been granted. A quick parenthesis: in case you didn’t know, the WHO has suggested to Countries that are profusely applying the vaccination campaign to lower the number of cycles (that’s what they are called) carried out to verify if a swab is positive or negative (below twenty, because beyond that you can find just about anything). Therefore, the result of the drop in infections is not due to the lesser spread of the virus by virtue of the vaccines’ efficacy, but simply because the analyses (in any case unsuited for diagnosing this type of positivity) are being carried out more correctly. Returning to the NRRP, the most substantial funding chapters, guess what, are assigned to: digitisation, innovation, competitiveness and culture (40.32 billion from the NRRP + 0.8 billion from React-EU + 8.74 from the complementary fund); green revolution and ecological transition (59.47 billion from the NRRP + 1.31 from React-EU + 9.16 from the complementary fund); infrastructures for sustainable mobility (25.4 bn from NRRP + 6.06 from the complementary fund); education and research (30.88 billion from the NRRP + 1.93 bn from React-EU + 1 billion from the complementary fund); inclusion and cohesion (19.81 bn from the NRRP + 7.25 from React-EU + 2.77 from the complementary fund). Thus, just like in Germany, “digitisation”, “green revolution” and “ecological transition” take the top spots. A coincidence? I should think not. What I think, on the contrary, is that it is exactly what the economically hegemonic class, the so-called “powers that be”, had in mind right from the beginning of this whole immense pantomime. The virus, obviously, is a means to radically change the economy and society. Once one Covid is over, you make another, to adapt an old Roman proverb about Popes. The “pandemic” is a method for achieving the desired change, and therefore can be used at will. At least as long as people continue to give credence to the current narrative, even if the latter is blatantly leaking from all sides. The fear of losing one’s life is the engine of this entire narrative, and out of fear of losing it, one fails to realise that, effectively, one is no longer living.

Your robot doctor

I conclude this long article with a final consideration. One of the main components of “digitisation” is precisely the one linked to Health. The latter, or rather Healthcare (a much broader concept than the one used in these last few years, I repeat, not by chance), is an exceedingly powerful means of controlling the masses. And this not only because illness is inherent to human nature, but also because through medicine one can determine the destiny of an individual, both in a positive and negative sense. The masses can also be steered towards certain types of behaviour, both with reflex reactions and with methodologies of a physical nature interacting with the human being. In this framework, so-called “telemedicine” will increasingly gain ground in the now imminent future. Telematic hubs will be created that will constantly monitor patients in their own homes, and the interaction with smartphones will be increasingly evident. In practice, there will be a total computerisation of our state of health and our life in general, where your doctor will be a computer programme or a robot doctor. Millions of data, as I mentioned earlier, which will be genuine gold both for the elites who hold the technological and financial means to do all this, and for their companies on which the whole of humanity now depends. So, besides control, profit too. The “Internet of Things”, for which 5G is necessary (they are already talking about 6G and beyond) is not a “cool thing”, it is the end of self-determination. You will be connected to the Web 24 hours a day and these billions of data will be precisely controlled via quantum computers. With digitisation, forget privacy, forget freedom of decision and movement, forget life as you have known it to this day. Welcome to the new, ecological, sustainable and digital world. The best of all possible worlds.