To arms! To arms! To arms, we are pro-Europeans, the terror of the Putinists…

To arms! To arms! To arms, we are pro-Europeans, the terror of the Putinists…

Albeit a parody of the lyrics (by Luigi Landi) of the well-known 1923 song (derived in turn from the Anthem of the Bersaglieri cyclists), I would say these words perfectly identify all the controversy currently raging about the “rearmament” race of the Old Continent.

By now there is no television or radio broadcast (no matter in which country) or website that does not talk about it: because of the bad guy Trump, who has decided to abandon the fight for Ukraine’s victory against Russia and who threatens to leave Europe stripped of the military defence of the “Big American Brother”, it is suddenly necessary to run for cover. So, billions galore, raining down as if in a deluge, the likes of which have never been seen for social services (Healthcare, Education, Infrastructure and whatever else might be needed in each European country). But as we know, ubi maior, minor cessat!

As I was saying, everything “seems” to have erupted suddenly after the talks held in the States at the end of February between the blonde quiff and the various heads of government of the major EU countries, plus that of Great Britain and “Sniffles”, alias Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian comedian.

Quite the pantomime, it must be said, worthy of the best Commedia dell’Arte, where all the masks staged a show for the cameras for the whole world to see. Everyone played their part: the Americans as the “bad cop”, all the others, starting with Keir Starmer, the British Prime Minister, as the “good cop”.

And so it was that Ursula and all the other little lapdogs started yapping to rouse the masses. Faced with the danger that Russia might not stop at the mere conquest of Ukraine (despite fighting, as has been known for some time, with hoes and recycled washing machine parts), but might continue on a raiding spree across the entire European territory, even letting their Cossack horses drink from the fountains of St Peter’s in Rome, it is necessary to close ranks and repel the invader. But…, wait: there is a problem! We gave all our old scrap metal to Ukraine, to defend themselves from the enemy. And now what do we do? Simple, we print money galore to supply ourselves with weapons and in about ten years we will be ready to face the terrible enemy. Obviously, we print in Frankfurt and you pay.

I think not even a primary school child could swallow such a string of idiocies, but as we know, the Scamdemic (Pandeminchia) docet, there is no limit to the moronic gullibility of the pro-European militant moron (militonto). And for this very reason I shall omit citing the various pieces of bullshit currently doing the rounds, pushed by the narrative of various lackeys (like the three-day survival kits) and various monologues about Ventotene…

Thus, with Krautlandia (Krucklandia) in the lead (which purposely changed the iron rule of a balanced budget written in its Constitution for the occasion), everyone immediately declared themselves willing to fork out eye-watering sums to enrich the arms industries, both European and transatlantic. Sacrifices must be made to defend the Homeland! So make them!

Indeed, for what better occasion to renew the arsenal of weaponry than a presumed defence against a presumed danger, which we ordinary citizens will have to pay for in the years to come? None, obviously.

And so Big Trump (Trumpone) secures an economic uplift for the American military industry (both for the orders it will receive and because US armaments can all be used to face the States’ real competitor, namely China) and the European Union finally has an excuse to form the so-called “European army”. Now it remains to be seen what this army will actually be used for. Something tells me it will be used almost exclusively against future rebellious movements of the European populations themselves, oppressed by the elites. The fairy tale of the race to enlist young (and less young) saplings to defend the homeland’s borders doesn’t even hold up as a joke: assuming for the sake of argument they found enough of them to counter the massive “enemy forces”, they would be efficient at the minimum required level, at best, not before several years. In practice, bishops and cardinals would have time to learn old Cossack songs in Russian (during the watering breaks of the aforementioned horses). Furthermore, if, as I believe, they will be used mainly to quell internal uprisings within the Union, these recruits might experience “dangerous” pangs of conscience, seeing as many of those they would be required to repress could be their relatives and acquaintances.

And so? And so, in addition to conventional weaponry (6th generation aircraft, tanks, ships, submarines and whatever else is produced as the flagship of specialised industries in the sector), I really think an objective will be the construction of robots controlled by Artificial Intelligence. There are various types already extensively tested in all the producing nations (China and the United States in the lead). They have no moral scruples and can be highly effective in the most difficult situations. I would say the ideal solution for both “policing” and combat tasks.

And Putin in all this? Russia stands watching (having absolutely no intention of “invading” any European country) and takes notes. It already has AI technologies and has started applying them to its own population. What better opportunity to see how the reaction of the Euro-idiot populace develops? I can imagine the laughs they must all be having at the highest echelons, starting with the true puppet masters of this Pantomime…

Thinking ill is a sin…

Thinking ill is a sin…

A short article to clarify what are, in my opinion, two “falsehoods” created ad hoc.

 

NATO expansion

The first concerns the course of the Atlantic Alliance’s expansion. Those who believe that NATO has broken the post-Berlin Wall agreements (namely that, in exchange for its fall, the West was not supposed to attempt to absorb the former States of the Soviet Union, which instead promptly happened) are crying foul. However, in my opinion, over time, what was once an incontrovertible truth has altered in light of the rapid development that all the participating actors have decided to impose upon the (very near) future of the world. What is taking place is a carving up of pre-established geopolitical spheres (I wrote about this here). Put simply, the USA and Great Britain on one side (with their acolytes Canada and Australia), and Russia and China on the other (with various acolytes in this case too), are rapidly completing this partition, where Ukraine represents the European border of their respective spheres of influence. Therefore, the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO is nothing but a further step towards the planned consolidation of these spheres of influence. All of this is passed off as a continuation of NATO’s initial breach of the pacts. What better excuse than the war in Ukraine to accelerate this process?

 

Famous “vaccinated” people getting sick

The second “falsehood” concerns the cases of Covid sickness found among the most famous proponents of the vaccination campaign, starting with that Anthony Stephen Fauci who has played a leading role in this whole affair. The controversial Dr Fauci supposedly fell ill with the Omicron variant despite being (so the mainstream narrative dictates) vaccinated no less than four times. A chorus of “I told you so!” immediately rose from the ranks of those who have always (rightly) been against mass vaccination for Sars-Cov-2. In reality, what I think is that it is all a charade—just as is the very fact that he actually got vaccinated (he and other active actors in this pantomime)—in order to show the flock of sheep who genuinely got vaccinated and then got sick anyway, perhaps even ending up in hospital, that yes, one does get sick after a whopping 4 doses of the vaccine, but in a milder way compared to an unvaccinated person. Obviously, the latter is a blatant falsehood, amply demonstrated by recent studies published in the most prestigious medical journals and as shown by a recent study carried out in Great Britain. But for the sheeple, what counts is the example and the repetition like a mantra of the fake news disseminated by the regime’s media. In practice, I think all these people are the classic smokescreen, the rabbit pulled out of the hat to reassure those who, at this point, are starting (a miracle!) to harbour a little doubt. What is the point of getting vaccinated if you get infected anyway and risk ending up in hospital in many cases? Obviously, I cannot concretely prove these theories, even though there are manifold indications suggesting they are correct. Let’s just say I am someone who tends to think the worst, but as Cardinal Giulio Mazzarino (later echoed by Giulio Andreotti) used to say: “Thinking ill of others is a sin, but one is often right.”

Theme: Overlay by Kaira
Everybody lies